Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana Unified County

Court

Indiana Unified County

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2020-03-09
Status Decided
Type F 6 Felony 6
Docket 73 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Segbers, Bobby D.
Photo of Hon. Schmaltz Kimberly A

Judge

Hon. Schmaltz Kimberly A

Dearborn County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Information Filed
  4. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  5. Initial Hearing
  6. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  7. Appearance Filed
  8. Report Filed
  9. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  10. Order on Initial Hearing
  11. Court Sets Bond
  12. Indigent Counsel Appointed at County Expense
  13. Service Returned Served: Order of Protection
  14. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  15. Service Returned Served
  16. No Contact Order Issued
  17. Answer Filed
  18. Appearance Filed
  19. Motion Filed
  20. Discovery Order Entered
  21. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  22. Order Issued
  23. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  24. Pretrial Conference
  25. Hearing Journal Entry
  26. Order on Pretrial Conference
  27. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  28. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  29. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  30. Final PreTrial Conference
  31. Order on Pretrial Conference
  32. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  33. Hearing Journal Entry
  34. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  35. Final PreTrial Conference
  36. Hearing Journal Entry
  37. Judgment
  38. Sentenced
  39. Service Returned Served: Order of Protection
  40. Plea Agreement Filed
  41. Order Granting Mot. to Enter Plea Pursuant to Plea Agreement
  42. Document Filed
  43. Abstract of Judgment Completed for non-DOC case
  44. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  45. Disposition Sent Electronically to Indiana State Police
  46. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  47. Administrative Event
  48. No Contact Order Issued
  49. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  50. Administrative Event
  51. No Contact Order Issued
  52. Correspondence to/from Court Filed
  53. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  54. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  55. Order Set for Hearing
  56. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  57. Motion Filed
  58. Order Set for Hearing
  59. Administrative Event
  60. Administrative Event
  61. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  62. Service Returned Not Served
  63. Service Returned Served
  64. Hearing
  65. Jury Trial
  69. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Order Set for Hearing ---- 7/30/2020 : Dearborn-Ohio Probation Department;ohio county (IN) sheriff;Michael A. Sarapata;Blaine Franklin Burgess;Lynn Marie Deddens
  70. Service Returned Not Served Order Set For Hearing
  71. Service Returned Served Order Set for Hearing
  72. Hearing Session: 08/14/2020 10:40 AM, Judicial Officer: Schmaltz, Kimberly A-MAG Comment: Request to have No Contact Order dropped
  73. CANCELED Jury Trial Reason: Agreed Resolution

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more