Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana Unified County

Court

Indiana Unified County

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2020-03-11
Status Decided
Type F 5 Felony 5
Docket 74 entries
Disposition Placement Order

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Reygaert Jr., Donald Louis
Photo of Hon. Verheye, Julie P

Judge

Hon. Verheye, Julie P

St. Joseph County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Appearance Filed
  4. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  5. Information Filed
  6. Motion Filed
  7. Motion Filed
  8. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  9. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Issued
  10. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Served
  11. Order on Initial Hearing
  12. Indigent Counsel Appointed at County Expense
  13. Advisement of Rights Conducted
  14. Omnibus Date
  15. Report Filed
  16. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  17. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  18. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  19. Appearance Filed
  20. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  21. Service Returned Not Served
  22. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  23. Initial Hearing
  24. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  25. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  26. Order on Hearing
  27. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  28. Discovery Filed
  29. Order Issued
  30. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  31. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  32. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  33. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  34. Discovery Filed
  35. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  36. Hearing
  37. Motion for Continuance Filed
  38. Order Granting
  39. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  40. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  41. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  42. Response Filed
  43. Jury Trial
  44. Jury Trial
  45. Plea Agreement Filed
  46. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  47. Hearing on Motion to Enter Plea Pursuant to Plea Agreement
  48. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  49. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  50. Order on Hearing
  51. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  52. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  53. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  54. Order Issued
  55. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  56. Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information
  57. Pre-Sentence Investigation Report Filed
  58. Report Filed
  59. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  60. Sentencing Hearing
  61. Order on Hearing
  62. Judgment
  63. Disposition Sent Electronically to Indiana State Police
  64. Sentencing Hearing
  65. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  66. Administrative Event
  67. Jury Trial
  68. Administrative Event
  69. Order Denying
  70. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  72. Administrative Event The defendant is requesting his sentence be served through Ducomb now that the hold in Elkhart has been taken care of. File Stamp: 03/23/2021
  73. Order Denying Motion for Modification of Placement Order Signed: 03/23/2021
  74. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Order Denying ---- 3/23/2021 : St. Joseph County Community Corrections;Kenneth P. Cotter;Philip Ryan Skodinski;St. Joseph County Adult Probation

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more