Lawyer
Catherine G. Daly
Indiana
Catherine G. Daly has appeared in 5 court cases in our database. View their complete case history and outcome statistics below.
About
Catherine Daly Criminal Barrister Year of Call2015; Door Tenant [email protected] Criminal Law Catherine is a 5* Google review rated Criminal Defence Barrister who became a Door Tenant at Walnut House after relocating to the Southwest. She is also a member of MC Chambers in London.(https://www.catherinedalycriminalbarrister.co.uk/)Accredited to undertake Public Access work (Bar Council 2019)Violence:Overview Catherine is regularly instructed in cases involving serious violence and murder/manslaughter, acting alone and as a led Junior. R v WCatherine was chosen as Junior Counsel to represent a 17-year accused of murder along with two other teenagers. The case involved CCTV experts, cell site experts and intermediaries. R v YCatherine represented a teenager accused of the attempted murder of a teenage girl who the Crown alleged was pushed over a 7th floor balcony. R v SCatherine represented a man charged with s.18 (GBH with intent) after getting into an altercation with the complainant on a night out. The complainant and other prosecution witnesses were off duty police officers. R v TCatherine represented a 15-year-old who along with his 14-year-old brother was charged with attempt murder. The defendants committed the offence against a 46-year-old man in themiddle of the day in a public park. The victim was so badly injured he was unable to give evidence. The prosecution eyewitness was the victims 10 year old son. R v SCatherine represented a young man accused of a gang related murder. Catherine successfully made an application to exclude alleged confession evidence. R v SCatherine represented a man charged with violent disorder, affray and assault on police and other emergency workers. Catherine successfully opposed the Crowns application to adduce bad character evidence. R v HCatherine represented a defendant charged with attempt murder who was diagnosed schizophrenic and initially unfit to stand trial. The defendant was later deemed fit, and the matter was remitted for trial. The defendant had caused his father very serious injury during a psychotic episode. Expert psychiatric evidence was relied upon. Recent work +Close -Drugs offences Overview Catherine has vast experience of acting in all drugs related matters in the Criminal Courts, including Confiscation Proceedings. R v PCatherine represented the first defendant in what was at the time, the largest class A drugs operation to be prosecuted in the northeast. There were 12 defendants, vast quantities of phone evidence and multiple experts. R v RCatherine represented a young defendant charged with PWITS class A. The defendant ran duress. R v CCatherine represented a 14-year-old charged with PWITS in a county lines drug case. The defendant had a positive NRM (modern slavery referral.)R v HCatherine successfully appealed a sentence of immediate imprisonment for a young lady caught with a small quantity of cocaine at a music festival. [2023] 1 Cr. App. R. (S.) 45 Recent work +Close -Sex offences Overview Catherine is regularly instructed to defend people charged with serious sexual offences. R v BCatherine represented a young defendant charged with the rape of his then partner. The Crown relied on a text message as a confession. R v ACatherine defended a young semi-professional cricketer accused of raping a young lady he met on a night out. There was extensive CCTV of the interaction between the parties invarious pubs before the incident. R v ACatherine acted for a defendant in an allegation of rape and other sexual offences involving two complainants he met on a dating application. Catherine successfully made an application to dismiss. R v BCatherine represented a defendant with complex psychological disorders accused of sexually assaulting his 5-year-old niece. R v TCatherine acted for a masseur charged with serious sexual offences against two of his customers. R v SCatherine represented a defendant accused of sexually assaulting his 10-year-old daughter. R v NCatherine represented a defendant charged with multiple sex offences against his granddaughter over a 7-year period. R v AR v ECatherine represented two appellants who sought to appeal against Sexual Harm Prevention Orders and Indefinite Notification Requirements (Sex Offenders Register). Recent work +Close -Parole Overview Catherine frequently appears in front of Parole Boards. Dangerous Dogs Overview Catherine has a particular interest in this area of law and is regularly instructed for the Defence in such cases. Appeals Overview Catherine regularly advises on appeal against conviction and sentence. She often appears in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. R v Healy (Courtney Morgan), [2023] 1 Cr. App. R. (S.) 45 R v Nyal Huskinson [2023] EWCA Crim 1559 R v Padman [2022] EWCA Crim 690 R v Tilley & Tilley [2023] EWCA Crim 41 Recent work +Close -Biographical and Other Information Academic BA(Hons) First Class Literature and Philosophy, MRes (Master of Research) in Philosophy with Distinction, Graduate Diploma in Law, BPTC City Law School, London. Scholarship Middle Temple Scholar (Brick Court Scholarship, Future Lawyers Excellence Award). Circuit London and Western Circuit. Association Criminal Bar Association. Interests Outside of work Catherine is a keen motorcycle and horse rider.
Case History
5 casesNo cases found.
Try searching with different criteria or browse by court.
Full Analytics Report
- Win/loss by case type
- Average case duration
- Settlement vs trial
- Opposing counsel analysis
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In